|
Convenience
is King
Online Consumers Show Growing
Preference for Receiving
and Paying Bills via the Internet
by
Karl Schumacher
Vice President, Global Business Strategy and Acquisition
Consumers
who are experienced with the Internet are continuing to show
a growing preference for both receiving and paying bills via
the Internet, according to the results of a recent study of
online consumers' bill-paying habits.
The
study, conducted by NFO Research for the Production Mail and
Document Factory Solutions Division of Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI),
shows a growing awareness on the part of online consumers
of the benefits of Internet billing and an increasing desire
to use the Internet to receive and pay bills covering a wide
variety of business transactions.
In
fact, the study confirms what many e-commerce observers have
come to believe that the time is ripe for meaningful growth
in Internet billing.
More
experience, more comfortable Why now? Because consumers are
ready. Many online consumers now have several years of experience
using the Internet for e-mail communications, for research,
and for shopping and paying for products and services via
credit card.
These
consumers are increasingly comfortable with the security of
Internet-related business transactions, and are showing a
greater willingness to receive bills online from regular business
partners and to authorize direct payment via the Internet.
The
NFO Research also supports the findings of another recent
study, conducted by Jupiter Research, which shows that the
number of consumers using the Internet to receive and pay
bills is expected to reach 18 million or ten times the current
number in just three years.
Not
surprisingly, the vast majority of online households responding
to the NFO Research survey reported that mail is still the
most widely used method for receiving and paying bills. Specifically,
85 percent of respondents reported using the mail for bill
receipt and payment.
However,
online households are increasingly cognizant of the many benefits
of online billing, such as speed and convenience, and indicate
a willingness to shift to that method of payment.
Nearly
a third of respondents said they preferred to receive their
bills in an electronic manner. And of those who prefer electronic
receipt, more than 50 percent said they would prefer to pay
their bills electronically, too.
Online
consumers value speed and convenience. It's pretty clear that
given a choice, online consumers don't want to waste time
opening and sorting through bills, writing checks, and then
stuffing and stamping envelopes each month.
Those
attitudes came through clearly when respondents were asked
if they would find it beneficial to receive and pay bills
online. Nearly 75 percent of respondents indicated they recognize
the benefits of digital delivery and said they would find
it beneficial to receive bills in a manner other than the
mail.
Even
more significant, an astonishing 95 percent of respondents
reported they would find it beneficial to both receive and
pay bills via the same electronic method.
When
asked about the types of bills they would most like to receive
and pay online, respondents indicated a clear preference for
the recurring monthly payments related to telephone, electricity,
gas and cable TV service, insurance protection and credit
cards.
Interestingly,
more than half of consumers who prefer the Internet as the
means of digital bill delivery said they prefer using a biller's
home page, with another quarter preferring the services of
a consolidator.
It's
not clear, however, whether the online households' preference
for using a biller's home page is due to familiarity with
the biller or to a perception of superior service and value.
Biller
direct vs. consolidator
Additionally, when asked about the convenience of consolidating
bills, the vast majority of respondents — nearly seven out
of ten — said they would find it valuable to consolidate billing.
That's
substantially more than indicated a preference for receiving
bills though the biller's home page. Why the difference? It
may be that online consumers are not yet familiar with the
services of consolidators, or that their particular bills
are not yet being consolidated.
So
mailers may want to consider the relative advantages of the
two models before deciding on a single approach. The 'biller
direct' model may have an initial advantage in attracting
online consumers due to their familiarity with the biller's'
home page. But the 'consolidation' approach may have a longer
term advantage due to the added convenience it potentially
offers consumers.
On
the other hand, there's no reason billers can't employ both
models, enabling consumers to choose for themselves where
they go to view and pay their electronic bills.
As
for the format of the online bills, respondents indicated
a strong preference for receiving their billing data in much
the same way that it appears in paper-based form today, or
in a format that presents summary data with the ability to
view details if desired through hotlinks or additional pages.
Less than 5 percent of respondents want summary data only.
Online
households also indicated strongly they want control over
security and access to their billing data. More than 80 percent
said they want the ability to choose a login ID and password
as opposed to having those control features assigned.
Additionally,
the amount owed tends not to be an obstacle for consumers
considering the payment of bills online. Nearly 20 percent
of respondents say they are comfortable with automatic direct
debiting to pay online amounts ranging from $30 to of $100;
another 22 percent say they are comfortable paying amounts
from $100 to $200; and anther 30 percent say they are comfortable
paying online amounts that are in excess of $200.
About
the study
The research study was conducted via e-mail among more than
300 online households nationwide and was completed in late
October, 1999. It mirrors a similar study conducted a year
earlier.
Survey
respondents represented a cross-section of online households
by age, sex, geographic location, market size and income levels.
- Age:
18-39 (40.7%), 40-59 (49%), 60+ (10.3%)
- Gender:
Male (34.8%), Female (65.2%).
- Geographic
location: Northeast (17.6%), South (32.1%), Central
(24.8%), West (25.5%).
- Market
Size: Rural or <100,000 (15.6%), 100,000 -
499,999 (14.9%), 500,000 -1,999,999 (21.2%), >2,000,000
(48.3%).
- Income
level: <$15K (6.6%), $15,000-29,999 (14.2%),
$30,000-49,999 (21.5%), $50,000-74,999 (26.8%), >$75K
(30.8%)
NFO Research,
Inc. provides information-based insight into the needs, behaviors,
and attitudes of the American consumer. The company services
over 450 clients, including 45 of the Fortune 100, providing
research for market tracking and assessment, product development,
concept and idea testing, copy testing and category management.
Return
to List of Articles
|