Analysts Reports

  Articles

  Events

  News Releases

  Top Stories

  Press Survey


ARTICLES

Petersburg Life Insurance* Reduces
Returned Mail by More Than Half
Firm is now saving nearly $600,000 a year and has
achieved a better rapport with customers and agents

Reducing costs is important for any organization. And one of the best ways to reduce costs is to attack the problem of returned mail.

That's what the Petersburg Life Insurance Company did recently. And the effort is yielding impressive savings -- nearly $600,000 a year in lower postage, handling, materials and labor costs. Plus, the firm is enjoying much improved relations with both its customers and agents.

"We knew for some time that returned mail was a problem at Petersburg Life," explains Richard Shriner*, who serves as Director of Document Technology and Services for the Missouri-based insurer.

"But we are a decentralized organization and we operate through eight independent business units. So it was difficult for us to gauge precisely the various costs that are associated with returned mail."

For assistance in determining the full scope of the problem, Shriner turned to the expertise of Pitney Bowes DMT, an organization that he worked with in an earlier job with another insurance company.

"I was experienced with the DMT Finalist software product, which is superb for standardizing, verifying and correcting addresses," he says. "And I thought Finalist would be involved in our solution in some way," he continues.

Quantify the problem
"But the eight autonomous business units of Petersburg Life distribute more than ten million mail pieces a year across dozens of applications – such as premium notices, statements of accounts, routine correspondence and agent commission statements -- and each unit views and handles the problem differently," he says.

So the first step was to focus on the facts and find out exactly how many mail pieces were returned each year, how they were handled, and how much it cost to receive, re-process and re-mail the messages.

A consultant with Pitney Bowes DMT, helped Shriner create a detailed survey, which was distributed to the eight business units and served to elicit the pertinent facts needed to understand the scope and cost of the problem at Petersburg Life.

According to Shriner, the survey revealed four key aspects to the returned mail problem.

First, more than 650,000 mail pieces -- or roughly 6.5 percent of the 10 million distributed each year -- were being returned marked Undeliverable as Addressed (UAA).

Second, the cost to handle and re-mail those messages, as well as investigate the invalid address information and update the firm's customer information database, was more than $1.1 million a year. That's nearly $2.00 apiece.

Third, relations with both customers and agents were being hampered because important communications were being delayed, and in some instances, not delivered at all.

Fourth, there was uncertainty as to whether the firm's current efforts were sufficient to comply with postal regulations and preserve its postage discount. The survey also revealed the major costs of returned mail.

  • More than $250,000 was for labor and the manual handling of returned mail and move notices, and efforts to contact customers and update the customer database.
  • More than $190,000 was for lost postage for messages that were never delivered to the recipient.
  • More than $72,000 was for an outside service to investigate and update invalid addresses.
  • More than $485,000 was for re-generating, re-processing and re-mailing the messages to a correct address.

To solve the dilemma, Petersburg Life implemented an integrated software solution involving three tools from Pitney Bowes DMT: StreamWeaver for print stream engineering, Finalist for assuring address quality, and ForwardTrak for fully meeting the USPS move update requirement. Here's how the new solution works.

Automated print stream processing
After each mailing application is processed at the mainframe, but before it is received at the print/mail finishing center, StreamWeaver automatically intercepts the print stream for conditioning and manipulation.

StreamWeaver then locates and extracts the name and address information for each mail piece and calls upon the Finalist software to standardize, verify and correct each piece e of address information.

Next, StreamWeaver invokes ForwardTrak to compares the customer address data in the print stream with the USPS move update database, which contains the last 13 months of move update data. Each address is then updated as necessary, and an additional file is created and appended, which enables the Petersburg Life's central customer database to be easily and automatically updated in batch mode as well.

Lastly, StreamWeaver performs a mail piece consolidation function by searching the print stream for multiple mail pieces going to the same recipient.

StreamWeaver then re-sequences the print stream so the related mail pieces are grouped together for easy inserting into a single envelope. Or, in the case of agents receiving a large combined mailing, the materials are grouped together for assembly into a single package.

As for results, Petersburg Life has migrated only two applications to the new solution thus far, but the improvements are already extraordinary.

Lower costs, higher productivity
First, the total number of returned mail pieces from those two applications has decreased by about 40 percent. If extrapolated over the insurer's entire annual mail volume, that means an eventual reduction of about 300,000 returned mail pieces each year, or a savings of about $600,000.

But Shriner expects those savings to be even higher over time because the merging of mail pieces is resulting in far less outgoing mail. "Our daily outbound mail volume is now lower by about 15 to 50 percent, depending on the specific application, which in turn is influenced by the number of customers holding multiple policies and the amount of mail going to our agents," he says. "But our total of returned mail will be declining well into the future."

Plus, Shriner believes even better results will be achieved once the firm's customer and agent databases receive regular updating. "We deal with about 60,000 agents and this year we mailed 1099 tax forms to about 17,000 who had commission income in 2001," he explains. "Typically, that mailing would result in several hundred pieces of returned mail. But this year we received only 10."

Lastly, the decrease in returned mail is allowing the firm to redeploy its people into higher value and more productive work. "Before we implemented the solution, we had the equivalent of 22 full time people working on some aspect of the returned mail problem," continues Shriner.

"We have already migrated most of those people to other tasks as the volume of returned mail has decreased." And as an added bonus, Shriner has learned that shifting the remaining mailing applications to the new processing solution is far easier than expected. "First, we were able to implement the first two applications without any involvement from our IT people, which is big advantage in time because of the heavy back log of work they face."

But just as important, Shriner continues, is the ease of shifting the subsequent applications to the new solution format. "The DMT Professional Service organization has been superb for us," he explains.

"We engaged DMT to implement the first two applications for us, so they performed the analysis, prepared the specifications and wrote the initial programs," he continues. "And they came in exactly on time and on target and without any glitches. Plus, those original programs were easy for us to replicate, so we can migrate additional applications with only minimal additional help, which helps speed our implementation and eventual pay back on our investment."

* These names have been changed at our customer’s request.

Return to List of Articles